Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Myerscough

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:49, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Myerscough

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced this person is notable. 4/5 references pertain to an arrest and legal conviction, so i'm not sure to what extent he would otherwise be considered notable enough for inclusion Flaming Ferrari (talk) 09:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 28. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 10:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:48, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No notability outside WP:BLP1E. Has turned into an attack page. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Definite WP:BLP1E and not enough coverage to keep. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 02:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with Xxan and MSC. I don't think we can have a BLP such as this where the majority of the text focuses on an arrest. Agricola44 (talk) 17:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PERP. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.